Cell Phones Should Not Be Allowed In The Classroom - Free Essay Example

Cell Phones should not be allowed in the classroom Technology has taken its toll on the current generation. Children, teens and young adults are less intent in learning and more interested in their wireless devices. In fact, students now prefer using their cell phones as means of studying over critical thinking. However, the manipulation of cell phones in the classroom is beneficiary in some ways like safety, emergency and enhance learning. Cell phones should be banned from classrooms because they cause distraction, and promotes cheating. It distracts students. One of the most popular things that has evolved within technology, is social media. Social media is an online way for students to participate in online communities. They are able to post, chat, and share images of their daily activities. Most students who bring their cellphones in the classroom spends most of their time posting, tweeting, and sharing on their social media. When they do this, they are unable to learn. He or she is unable to understand what the lesson is about at that point in time. This could ultimately result in low or failed grades. According to Doward, Jamie. The test score of teenage increase by 6.4% after prohibiting cell phone in classroom. Cellphones in the classroom promotes cheating. There are many websites, online forums, and tutors available online. Most of the websites require subscriptions. These resources, allows students to ask a question about their homework and they will be provided the answer. If a student is allowed to bring their cell phone, he will have access to submit his question and receive the answer. Another con of having cellphones in the classroom is that if the student has a friend that takes the same class at a different time, they are able to take a picture of the questions or text them the answers to the test. Both of these is a violation of a student code of ethics. According to Lenhart, Amanda, and others 54% of teens use their phone for text message, this can be used as a medium of cheating by texting others for answers in an on going test. Being able to use cell phones in the classroom does have its benefits. Students are able to use additional resources for their lesson plans. This can help with their complete understanding of their homework. Also, cell phones are a good asset for safety purposes. In the most recent news, there was a school shooting that happened in Houston Texas. The shooter, a current student at Santa Fe High School, walked in the school and started shooting. There were numerous of 911 calls placed from inside the school, from students, to notify the authorities. This helps with a faster response from emergency officials.   Cell phones are used good things also, but most student use it bad things. In Conclusion, the use of cell phones in the classrooms should not be allowed it affect students negatively. It makes students lose focus. There are some student who loves peaceful environment to learn, but if a phone rings in the those student get distracted. It is also use an instrument to cheat. If the teacher ask the students whom make use of their cell phone in classroom what they gain out of the lecture, they probably would not be able to answer. Therefore cell phones should not be allowed in the classroom.

Research the Property Rights Theory of the Firm - 550 Words

Research the Property Rights Theory of the Firm (Essay Sample) Content: KENYATTA UNIVERSITYSCHOOL ECONOMICSDEPARTMENT APPLIED ECONOMICSUNIT CODE EAE 408UNIT NAME ECONOMICS OF INDUSTRYREG. NO K24/2463/2012NAME NDUTA M WANJIRUTASK ASSIGNMENTLEC Dr. ISAAC KINUTHIADATE 15TH OCTOBER 2015Property rights are theoretical constructs determining how a resource is used and owned. They are laws created by governments in regard to how individuals can control, benefit from and transfer property.The standard property rights theory of the firm assumes that prior to investing in human capital, team members meet and negotiate asset ownership.The property rights theory assumes that the ownership of non human assets explains firmsà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬ boundaries; a firm consists of those assets it owns, over which it has control.This theory does not distinguish between ownership and control, but defines ownership as the capacity to exercise control. It states that control is achieved through the ownership of physical assets.The theory assumes that ownership gives the owner the rights to dispose of physical assets that the owner has not given away, or that the government has not taken by force.WeaknessesIt fails to perceive that ownership does not necessarily give the legal control to dispose property , as property law tells us that ownership consists of a bundle of rights.It focuses on physical assets which cannot operate independently of expertise/ skills.It argues that control over physical assets can lead to control of human assets that are embedded in the organization capital.By protecting property rights, the Government of Kenya will achieve the Vision 2030 objective of enhancing investments in the following ways;Certain property rights arrangements can reduce transaction costs in exchange and production and encourage (sunk costs) investments to promote overall economic growth.Individua ls will create new forms of property to generate wealth because they are assured that their rights to their property will protect them against unjust and/ or unlawful actions by other partiesProperty rights increase competition, which encourages investment. This is because property rights convey the right to benefit or harm oneself or others. Harming a competitor by producing superior products may be permitted.Investment is encouraged if improved transfer rights make it easier for individuals to rent or sell their p...